Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 19:41:41 -0800
From: Michael Jacques <Mykloma-AT-pacinfo.com>
Subject: Re: Osseous 'Orse


> The idea that the "Clinton debacle" is nothing more than a ploy, an
> obfuscation if you will, seems painfully obvious. The media has assumed
> that the president's... ahem... peccadillos are a matter of national
> urgency. With so much change going on in the societal paradigm I find it
> amusing that Kenneth Starr et al have secured such a prominant portion of
> the media's attention. Edward's postulation that some sort of un-named
> horror has occurred in the depths of the political bowels is attractive. I
> bring up as a parallel the gloriously blatant nonsense concerning the
> discovery of the asteroid that is allegedly coming close to our planet in
> 30 years. Over just a matter of days, this asteroid went from sideswiping
> the earth to completely missing it. I personally question the voracity of
> media reports. Or even reports by any sizable organization with agendas
> that may not be completely straightfoward. If the movers and shakers are
> privy to information that is denied to the mainstream public, what form
> would their reactions take? This gets back to the quality (or degradation
> thereof) of man's illusions today. I find it depressing that something as
> childish and base as the president's sexual discretions are being used to
> placate the public. I'd like to hear something really imaginative come out
> of the press.
>
> Has it occurred to anyone that the "Clinton debacle" might be a ploy, an
> elaborate effort to turn the gaze of the nation away from some un-named
> horror that has erupted within the governmental structure of the U.S.A.?
> Is it not possible that, like professional wrestlers, Clinton, Starr,
> Lewinsky et. al., are all getting together after a fruitful day of
> media-mongering savagery and having drinks and lines, and fondling one
> another excessively -- all in the name of fun? and blind to the demise
> of the country in which they reside as prominent figureheads of
> democracy -- or should I say, demagogy?
>
> So that is my take on the whole absurd scenario.
>
> In primum veracium ... et Deum,
>
> Edward
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com