From: "otto" <PYRBH-AT-snow.csv.warwick.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 13 May 1995 01:55:30 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Three Questions Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 20:03:47 -0400 (EDT) From: glevy-AT-acnet.pratt.edu To: technology-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu Subject: Three Questions Reply-to: technology-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu 1) Is there anybody out there? I haven't received any messages from this list. >>Hello - your message is actually the 1st 1 I've gotten from this list since I joined over a week ago, so I would have guessed that the server was down, except that I get mail every day from other lists sent by jefferson.village.virginia (the d&g list & marxism-digest, for 2). Maybe there was a mass suicide on this list or something? Can anyone clue us newones in on the status of discussion? Since it's a weird situ, I'll do something i rarely do & actually give my opinions on your other 2 questions. . . 2) How will the merger movement and "maturation" in the personal computer industry (especially the software market) affect the pace of development of new product technologies in that industry? >>Hmmmm. . . You know some s/w companies filed anti-trust suit against mr. microsoft, & they have perturbed the judge in the case by demanding to remain anonymous for fear of retribution from microsoft? (read this in edupage this week.) And in reality, microsoft can crush anyone they like - this is probably a common topic of discussion/bitching on lists that I don't read. But I follow that often bastardized line that s/w & computers in general are qualitatively different types of products, & it is indeed within the power of anyone with an unimplemented idea to startup a compnay & have a million dollars within 2 months. >>The WWWeb & easy-to-use e-money will only accelerate this freedom of the isolated entrepeneur, to distribute a product/service/newsoftware or info via the net, & collect a charge. even at 1 penny per page of good info/pictures/software, if you have a crowd of 1000s downloading your info pages daily, you can quit your day job & start investing in servers & product development. This is also why fictitious products & ubiquitous big companies in science fiction novels always seem so realistic & natural - we have no problem believing that someone in 2004 will come up with an ingenious X that everyone will immediately buy, like Mr. Lee's Hong Kong franchises in Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson. This is just one aspect of your question, & I'm sure if you'v heard of these things, you were probably asking about the bigger picture. What do you think? 3) How will NAFTA affect factory automation in U.S. industries? For example, will the diffusion of industrial robotics, CAD/CAM, and flexible manufacturing systems be retarded if manufacturers choose to build plants in the North of Mexico which are labor-intensive (and which pay low wages and benefits and require less skills) rather than plants using advanced industrial process technologies? >>To my blind-capitalist-side, a robot & a cheap worker are interchangeable. If an automated plant can be mad efficient enough so that the cost of each robot or chunk of hardware is the same or less as the cost of a norten~o worker, than hi-tek plants will survive & thrive on the push of the competition from the south. If robots turn out to be too expensive or costly to maintain, which they often are - see article about Toyota City's new less automated, more productive production line in a recent Economist - then more business & economic power will go to mexico & begin to seep further south to the even cheaper workers in central & south america. >>The labour union politics of this are obviously much more complicated. Mexico's big labour leaders said this week that the pay raises have already been exceed by the inflation rate to April, & so the rest of the inflation thru the year will just push real wages further in the hole, until workers are paid something completely reeediculous & unlivable like a dollar or 2 a day. They threaten strikes & violence already, so by the end of summer I hope things get real nasty for Colosio, IMHO, I should add! >>So please do respond, as I'd like to know what this list is like, though I won't have time to contribute much (see WWW address below for details of my servitude). see you. . . otto virtual-futures-AT-warwick.ac.uk Tel: (44) (01203) 523-523 x2952, or x2582 Fax: (44) (01203) 523-019 http://www.warwick.ac.uk/WWW/faculties/social_studies/Philosophy/vf95web.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --- from list technology-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005