Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 04:42:40 -0500 From: atefeh oliai <atefeho-AT-vms2.macc.wisc.edu> Subject: Re: Article by Dr. Nawal Saadawi Dear Ramesh Thanks for the article and message. I'll send it to all friends. I was wondering if I could have a copy of the platforme of you organisation. Can I contact you directly? I have few questions. Atefeh At 11:35 AM 5/11/96, you wrote: >Received: from jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU by wigate.nic.wisc.edu; > Sat, 11 May 96 11:35 CDT >Received: (from daemon-AT-localhost) by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU > (8.7.1/8.6.6) id MAA80962 for third-world-women-outgoing; > Sat, 11 May 1996 12:17:54 -0400 >Received: (from spoons-AT-localhost) by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU > (8.7.1/8.6.6) id MAA60477 for third-world-women; > Sat, 11 May 1996 12:17:52 -0400 >Received: from emout19.mail.aol.com (emout19.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.45]) > by jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU (8.7.1/8.6.6) > with SMTP id XAA100998 for <third-world-women-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu>; > Fri, 10 May 1996 23:09:13 -0400 >Received: by emout19.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA11358; > Fri, 10 May 1996 23:08:11 -0400 >Message-Id: <960510230811_396103484-AT-emout19.mail.aol.com> >Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 23:08:11 -0400 >From: Ncwdi1-AT-aol.com >Reply-To: third-world-women-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU >Sender: owner-third-world-women-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU >Subject: Article by Dr. Nawal Saadawi >To: WMST-L-AT-umdd.umd.edu >CC: third-world-women-AT-jefferson.village.virginia.edu >Resent-Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 12:17:52 -0400 >Resent-From: Spoon Collective <spoons-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU> >Resent-To: third-world-women-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU >Resent-Message-Id: <199605111617.MAA60477-AT-jefferson.village.Virginia.EDU> >X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) >Precedence: bulk > >Dear Freinds, >Dr. Saadawi has asked me to circulate her article to as many >women's mailing lists and organizations as I can. Therefore I ask you >to do the same. >Dr. Saadawi's article will soon to be publised in the USA, but please >circulate among other news groups and bulletin boards. >Please forward any questions or suggestions to this e-mail address. >Best Wishes, >Ramesh Sepehrrad >President of National Committee of Women for Democratic Iran > >Enc. >************************************************** >THE RITE AND THE RIGHT > >by: Dr. Nawal El Saadawi > >"To scrape my women parts off" is how Mrs. Kasinga of Togo describes the rite >of female circumcision. >She fled her country because of this threat and in seeking asylum in the U.S. >has had spend the last two years in prison. The U.S. authorities do not >consider genital mutilation to be violation of human rights or a reason for >granting asylum. What are the options available to Ms. Kasinga and thousands >of young women like her who are exposed to this same fate? > >As a medical doctor I have been fighting and writing, for more than thirty >years, against this cruel rite which deprive millions of women all over the >world of one of their basic human rights: the right to have a complete body. > >It has very often been proclaimed that female circumcision is related to the >black African or Moslem societies. But, in fact, it is performed on women >regardless of their religious beliefs. When I was in primary school in Egypt, >all my school mates were circumcised: Christians, Jews as well as Moslems. In >African and Asian countries it is performed on women who believe in one god >as well as those who belong to polytheistic pt atheistic communities. > >Women in Europe and America are not exempt from this practice. It is >estimated that in the U.S. approximately 40,000 women are circumcised every >year. Most of them are immigrants from different parts of the world. Many of >those women who are not necessarily subjected to surgical removal of the >clitoris are victims of psychological and educational clitoridectomy. > >Sigmund Freud promoted psychological circumcision of women when he formulated >his theory and maintained that maturity and mental health in a women required >that orgasm related to the clitoris cease and be transferred to the vagina. >The abolition of the functions of the clitoris is equal to its abscence. It >might even be considered more malicious because it produces the illusion of >being complete, whereas the body has lost the organ. > >The class patriarchal system which imposes monogamy on women could never have >been possible or have been maintained to this day without a whole range of >cruel devices that are used to keep women's sexuality in check and limit her >sexual relations to only one men, her husband. In this patriarchal system >history shows us that the father was keen on knowing who his legitimate >children were so as to had down his property to them. It was necessary to >build up a system of legal, moral, cultural and religious values capable of >protecting these economic and political interests. Confusion between children >of the husband and other lovers would mean the unavoidable collapse of the >patriarchal class system built around knowing the name of the father. > >There are currently attempts being made in the U.S. on both the state and >national level to abolish the practice of female genital mutilation. Several >states have addressed this issue and currently five states have bills > pending on the subject, one state is planning on introducing a bill and two >states, Minnesota and North Dakota, have actually passed legislation >prohibiting the procedure. > >Representative Patricia Schroeder, D-Colorado, has sponsored a bill in >Congress that would make it illegal to perform female genital mutilation, of >any degree, on women under age of 18, unless it is for health purposes and is >rendered by a licensed medical practitioner. The religious beliefs of a women >requesting this procedure who claims that this is a required matter of custom >or ritual are not be taken into account. The provision of other medical >services are not to be denied to anyone having had female circumcision or >having requested it. > >This bill also requests that the Secretary of Health and Human Services >compile data on the number of females living in the U.S. who have experienced >female genital mutilation while identifying the communities practicing this >ritual. The design of outreach programs educating the community on the >physical and psychological health effects of this procedure is also proposed. >It will seek to ensure that medical schools provide education pertaining to >female gentile mutilation and it complications. > >According to Surita Sadosham, Executive Director of Equality Now, her >organization has been campaigning to rise awareness about and mobilize >pressure to prohibit the practice of female genital mutilation. They have >been instrumental in placing a great amount of international pressure, >through the media, to aid in the granting of asylum to Fauziga Kasinga. > >I am against all types of circumcision including male circumcision, which us >not as detrimental as female circumcision , but is still harmful and may >cause complications. To cut out any part of the human body for non-medical >reasons should be considred a crime. It is a crime graver than any political >crime could ever be considred. > >I oppose all attempts to consider female circumcision a cultural issue, such >as choosing to wear a veil in Moslem countries. It is not be considred a >choice in authenticating the identity of women, or as right to be differnt in >a multicultural world. > >I also oppose all attempts to deal with female circumcision in isolation, >serving it from its links with historical, political and economic factors. > >Ms. Kasings was exposed to double crime: the old tribal rite and the >post-modern U.S.A. Immigration right. She is a female facing gentile >mutilation and she is an alien and therefore not credible. In her prison cell >she dreams of her home Togo. Sometimes the family rite is less cruel than >alien right. > > > > >
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005