Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 06:51:51 -0500
From: atefeh oliai <atefeho-AT-vms2.macc.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: CEBU-USA CORRESPONDENCE CLUB


This is horrible!
I finally got the "chance" to read the message which has rightly enraged our
fellows!
A lots of questions:
first :    this list do not serve p...ps!!! A clarification for some
"gentle"people 
             who are concerned with asian women's needs!!!

Second: who  does Beaty think that an  "american gentleman"!!!  or any
                 gentleman for that matter,  is, so that  a woman should
"send " a                  resume along with a   "recent" photo!!! to His
Imp. H.?
   
Third:Why the hell his/her american "gentleman" are looking for asian
women?  To exploit them gently"?  As we say back home (Iran), to
"cut their throat with cotton"?  Aren't we enough exploited in our
           homeland?  These "gentle"man must be found of our exotic
            "cuisine"!!

Forth:  Are we ( third world women) here  to perpetuate the same old s..t in
             a different place with different "gentle/men"?

Fifth:  Beaty seems to be a good business wo/man too !! sending Free
add.  all  over the world!!!  I am sure his american "gentle"man know
very  well their system's laws, the one which fit very well with their
"suit"!     


Would anyone like to continue this ? I am sur questions can go easily up
to 100's!!
A lots of my male friend would.

Until later
atefeh


At 07:45 AM 7/1/96 +1000, you wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Jun 1996 Beaty111-AT-aol.com wrote:
>
>> Filipinas, and other asian women, who are interested in
>> corresponding with American gentlemen may send a letter
>> about themselves, including bio-data, along with a recent photo to:
>> Cebu-USA Correspondence Club, P.O. Box 659, Hyannisport,
>> MA 02647, U.S.A. - Your letter should specify your purpose,
>> such as:  love, friendship, penpal, seeking a lifetime partner, etc.
>> You may also visit our web site:
>> http://ccsnet.com/users/beaty111/cebu.htm
>> 
>> 
>I also believe that it is entirely inappropriate to use this list for 
>these purposes, to say nothing of the exploitative nature of such clubs.  
>I would like to see Beaty respond to the questions raised and not 
>just attempt to shrug off complicity in exploitation with an "apology".
>
>